Experimental studies have demonstrated that dextran-70 reduces the leukocyte–endothelium interaction, but clinical evidence is still lacking. Our objective was to justify the anti-inflammatory effect of dextran-70 following cardiac operations.
Forty patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (
In group A, lower peak (median) plasma levels of procalcitonin (0.2 versus 1.4,
Our investigation demonstrated that the use of dextran-70 reduces the systemic inflammatory response and cardiac troponin-I release following cardiac operation.
ISRCTN38289094.
Cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in a complex immune response characterized by the activation of all inflammatory pathways and strongly related to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. The immune activation due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome exposes the patient to postoperative wound healing complications and to the development of infections [
Increased levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 play a major role in the pathogenesis of ischaemia-reperfusion injury [
Several investigations have demonstrated that artificial colloids modulate the inflammatory response. Animal experiments have confirmed that dextran decreases the endothelial adhesion of PMNs in the postischaemic phase independently of the haemodilution [
It has been reported that hydroxyethyl starches (HES) reduce capillary leakage [
Without any evidence of modulating the inflammatory response, gelatin infusion has been considered pharmacologically inert [
Despite numerous studies having been published concerning the influence of colloids on inflammation, only few comparative studies exist. Reducing the endothelial adhesion of PMNs, dextran was reported to be more potent than HES in leukocyte-related reperfusion injury, and in contrast to HES the anti-inflammatory effect of dextran developed even in nondilutional microdose administration [
On the basis of experimental data it may be hypothesized that dextran attenuates the inflammatory response following cardiac surgery. There are, however, no exact clinical data in the literature that would support the anti-inflammatory effect of dextran following cardiac surgery. Our objective was the investigation of the effects of dextran-70 compared with gelatin as a control, on the levels of serum procalcitonin, on the inflammatory cytokine response, the markers of endothelial damage, myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and haemodynamics after CPB. Our hypothesis was that administration of dextran reduces the level of inflammatory mediators and cardiac troponin-I (cTr-I) at the most important timepoints.
With permission from the ethical committee of the hospital, 40 patients undergoing elective first-time CPB – 32 patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)), eight patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) – were involved in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study after individual consent was obtained. The setting of the study was single institutional. Two experienced anaesthesiologists and two experienced surgeons were involved in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 'redo' operation, hepatic disease, renal dysfunction, immunologic disease, steroid treatment, intake of aspirin or other cyclooxygenase inhibitor within 7 days prior to surgery, or known allergy to volume expanders used in the study. None of the patients received volatile anaesthetics, steroids or aprotinin and haemofiltration was not used either. No shed mediastinal blood was retransfused during the postoperative period.
Two groups were formed following computerized randomization. Twenty patients (CABG, 17 patients; AVR, three patients) were given dextran-70 (6%; average molecular weight 70,000 Da) infusion (Macrodex; Pharmalink, Inc., Upplands Väsby, Sweden) (group A), while in the control group 20 patients (CABG, 15 patients; AVR, five patients) were given oxypolygelatin (5.5%; average molecular weight 30,000 Da) infusion (Gelifundol; Biotest Pharma, Inc., Dreieich, Germany) (group B). Following the induction of anaesthesia, artificial colloid was administered using infusion pumps (Model 591; IVAC, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). After the application of hapten inhibition by 20 ml dextran-1 (Promit; Fresenius Kabi, Inc., Norge AS, Norway), dextran-70 infusion was used at the dose of 7.5 ml/kg for 30 minutes before CPB, and at a dose of 12.5 ml/kg for 14 hours following the cessation of CPB. Gelatin was infused by the same body-weight-based volume as dextran. The indication of the colloid administration was volume substitution. Depending on the actual haemodynamic and volume status, crystalloid infusion was administered together with a fixed dose of colloid.
Anaesthesia was carried out by a standardized total intravenous method. Premedication was achieved with midazolam. For the induction of anaesthesia, midazolam, propofol in a target controlled infusion perfusion device using Diprifusor™ (Alaris Medical Systems, Hampshire, UK), alfentanil and pipecuronium were used, while propofol (target controlled infusion) and alfentanil were given to maintain anaesthesia. Anticoagulation was maintained with heparin (initial value 300 IU/kg) to keep the activated clotting time longer than 400 seconds. Protamine was administered in a 1:1 ratio based on the initial heparin bolus (necessary to achieve the target activated clotting time). Cardiopulmonary bypass was carried out in normothermia, with the use of a roller pump (Cobe Cardiovascular, Inc., Arvada, Colorado USA), with pulsatile flow rate of 2.4 l/min/m2 and a membrane oxygenator (Affinity™ NT 541; Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Antegrade, cold, crystalloid cardioplegia (modified Bretschneider solution) injected into the aortic root was used for myocardial protection. The Pulsion PiCCO™ (Pulsion Medical Systems, Inc., München, Germany) device was used for haemodynamic monitoring.
Packed red blood cell administration was applied when the haemoglobin level was less then 90 g/l, or during CPB when haemoglobin was below 70 g/l. Postoperative complications were defined as follows: cardiovascular complication (low cardiac output with cardiac index <2.2 l/min/m2 after volume infusion, requiring the use of positive inotrop agents and/or intraaortic balloon pump); perioperative myocardial infarction with typical electrocardiogram changes and creatine kinase MB >75 U/ml (three times the upper limit of the reference range); acute lung injury (prolonged ventilation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200); acute renal failure (serum creatinine >230 μmol/l); neurologic complications (stroke, ischaemic insults); gastrointestinal complications (ischaemia, bleeding); and infections.
Arterial blood samples were taken from the indwelling femoral artery cannula at the following time intervals: t1, before anaesthesia; t2, 10 minutes after CPB; t3, 2 hours after CPB; t4, 4 hours after CPB; t5, 24 hours after CPB; and t6, 44 hours after CPB. At the same timepoints, the following haemodynamic parameters were registered: heart rate, arterial blood pressure, cardiac index, stroke volume index, stroke volume variation, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), intrathoracic blood volume index, and extravascular lung water index. The haematocrit (packed cell volume), haemoglobin and blood cell count were measured at all time intervals. Determination of the plasma concentration of inflammatory mediators – interleukins (IL-6, IL-6r, IL-8, IL-10) and soluble adhesion molecules (soluble endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (sELAM-1), soluble ICAM-1) – was carried out by ELISA (DIACLONE Research™, Besançon, France) complying with the technologic regulations of the manufacturer. Blood samples were centrifuged with a cooled centrifuge at 1,000 ×
Three plasma samples were analysed for cytokine and soluble adhesion molecule levels with the sampling timepoints based on the kinetics of the single mediators according to the data in the literature. In each case the first measurement point was the preoperative control value, the second was the expected maximal value of the given mediator after cardiac surgery, while the third measurement point was the value corresponding to the dropoff phase [
Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS for Windows 9.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). After obtaining the results for 22 patients a midterm analysis was performed to calculate the necessary total sample size – Altman's nomogram [
For the comparison of the basic data, the chi-squared test and Student's
Past medical and perioperative data of the two groups are presented in Table
Anamnestic and perioperative data
Group A | Group B | ||
Age (years) | 61.1 ± 6.5 | 62.5 ± 7.6 | 0.535 |
Gender (male/female) | 13/7 | 14/6 | 0.736 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.7 ± 3.9 | 28.9 ± 3.8 | 0.821 |
Hypertension (%) | 47.2 | 52.8 | 0.292 |
Diabetes mellitus (type I/type II/impaired glucose tolerance) (%) | 2/4/1 | 2/3/1 | 0.733 |
Preoperative ejection fraction (%) | 55.6 ± 12.6 | 56.1 ± 9.7 | 0.906 |
EuroScore (log) (%) | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 2.9 ± 1.4 | 0.405 |
Amount of plasma substitute (ml) | 1626 ± 212 | 1606 ± 205 | 0.725 |
Amount of crystalloids (ml) | 4172 ± 660 | 4107 ± 665 | 0.765 |
Number of anastomoses (coronary artery bypass graft) | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 0.991 |
Aortic Xclamp (min) | 53 ± 13.8 | 59 ± 18.1 | 0.403 |
Cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass duration (min) | 83 ± 23.7 | 90 ± 29.3 | 0.401 |
Operation time (min) | 249 ± 64.5 | 258 ± 61.7 | 0.634 |
Minimum rectal temperature (°C) | 34.8 ± 0.6 | 35.0 ± 0.5 | 0.274 |
Preoperative packed cell volume | 0.40 ± 0.034 | 0.39 ± 0.040 | 0.723 |
Postoperative 44 hours packed cell volume | 0.30 ± 0.035 | 0.30 ± 0.035 | 0.623 |
Postoperative drainage (44 hours, ml) | 818 ± 286 | 588 ± 179 | 0.005 |
Red blood cell transfusion (U) | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 0.548 |
Extubation time (hours) | 9.2 ± 4.1 | 9.3 ± 4.6 | 0.894 |
Intensive care unit stay (hours) | 54 ± 23 | 47 ± 6 | 0.209 |
Hospital stay (days) | 9.9 ± 2.4 | 8.9 ± 1.3 | 0.114 |
Data presented as the mean ± standard deviation. aChi-squared test or Student's
The peak level of procalcitonin was lower in group A (Figure
Results of the inflammatory mediators and cardiac troponin I
t1 | t2 | t3 | t4 | t5 | t6 | ||
C-reactive protein (mg/l) | |||||||
Group A | 3.7 (1.0–22.6) | 79.9 (50.0–131.7) | 112.0 (61.1–177.6) | <0.001† | |||
Group B | 2.6 (0.6–10.5) | 87.6 (52.4–143.0) | 131.0 (71.0–228.0) | <0.001† | |||
IL-6 (pg/ml) | |||||||
Group A | 1.6 (0.4–21.8) | 95.0 (13.6–405.1) | 46.3 (16.1–149.5) | <0.001† | |||
Group B | 2.0 (0.4–60.6) | 130.5 (21.7–353.8) | 49.2 (14.8–214.5) | <0.001† | |||
IL-6r (ng/ml) | |||||||
Group A | 43.6 (1.7–125.0) | 47.4 (0.7–109.5) | 56.2 (25.2–226.3) | 0.949† | |||
Group B | 40.7 (15.6–94.6) | 42.4 (22.2–100.5) | 50.2 (13.2–104.9) | 0.861† | |||
IL-10 (pg/ml) | |||||||
Group A | 1.9 (0.2–24.0) | 47.2 (2.3–476.6) | 7.2 (1.3–90.9) | <0.001† | |||
Group B | 2.6 (0.8–9.7) | 209.7 (16.3–814.3) | 56.1 (3.6–225.1) | <0.001† | |||
Soluble endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (ng/ml) | |||||||
Group A | 88.6 (49.8–194.5) | 88.5 (14.4–189.6) | 72.7 (8.9–163.1) | 0.058† | |||
Group B | 49.0 (18.3–144.1) | 130.7 (33.0–360.7) | 72.6 (16.7–224.7) | <0.001† | |||
Cardiac troponin-I (ng/ml) | |||||||
Group A | 0.02 (0.01–0.022) | 0.22 (0.07–0.85) | 0.13 (0.03–0.75) | <0.001† | |||
Group B | 0.01 (0.01–0.016) | 0.66 (0.10–1.28) | 0.19 (0.03–0.80) | <0.001† | |||
Data presented as the median (range). t1, before anaesthesia; t2, 10 minutes after cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); t3, 2 hours after CPB; t4, 4 hours after CPB; t5, 24 hours after CPB; t6, 44 hours after CPB. †Intraindividual differences (Friedman test), *between-group differences (Kruskal–Wallis test).
Procalcitonin plasma levels before operation and 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. Procalcitonin (PCT) plasma levels in the treated and control groups, before operation (t1) and 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass (t5). Significant elevation was found in both groups (*Friedman tests). After the operation, procalcitonin was lower in group A. The between-group difference was significant (+ Kruskal–Wallis test).
IL-8 plasma levels before operation and after cardiopulmonary bypass. IL-8 plasma levels in the treated and control groups, before operation (t1) and 10 minutes (t2) and 2 hours (t3) after cardiopulmonary bypass. Significant elevation was found in both groups (*Friedman tests). At t2 and t3 the IL-8 plasma levels were lower in group A. The between-group differences were significant (+Kruskal–Wallis test).
Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 plasma levels before operation and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) plasma levels in the treated and control groups, before operation (t1) and 24 hours (t5) and 44 hours (t6) after cardiopulmonary bypass. No elevation was found in group A, but the elevation was significant in group B (*Friedman tests). The between-group differences were significant after cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (+Kruskal–Wallis test).
No difference was found between CABG and AVR patients in the inflammatory markers or cTr-I, except for ICAM-1 in group B, which was higher among AVR patients before operation (
Patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation or pacemaker rhythm in the VVI mode (group A, five patients; group B, four patients) were excluded from the analysis of haemodynamic data. The cardiac index and stroke volume index were higher while the SVRI figures were lower in group A, with an observed statistical power of 83%. The intrathoracic blood volume index, stroke volume variation, heart rate, arterial blood pressure (systolic) (
Results of the haemodynamic data
t1 | t2 | t3 | t4 | t5 | t6 | ||
Heart rate (l/min) | 0.925 | ||||||
Group A | 60 ± 12 | 76 ± 14 | 78 ± 13 | 84 ± 18 | 84 ± 7 | 92 ± 10 | |
Group B | 59 ± 8 | 72 ± 9 | 78 ± 12 | 81 ± 12 | 87 ± 12 | 97 ± 12 | |
Stroke volume index (ml/m2) | 0.026 | ||||||
Group A | 38.5 ± 6.5 | 33.5 ± 9.1 | 31.9 ± 8.2 | 32.8 ± 9.0 | 36.9 ± 13.8 | 36.1 ± 7.4 | |
Group B | 36.4 ± 5.7 | 30.2 ± 5.8 | 27.6 ± 8.0 | 27.6 ± 7.5 | 31.3 ± 10.0 | 30.1 ± 5.0 | |
Cardiac index (l/min/m2) | 0.010 | ||||||
Group A | 2.3 ± 0.45 | 2.4 ± 0.39 | 2.4 ± 0.63 | 2.7 ± 0.63 | 3.0 ± 0.98 | 3.4 ± 0.94 | |
Group B | 2.2 ± 0.36 | 2.2 ± 0.31 | 2.0 ± 0.41 | 2.2 ± 0.44 | 2.6 ± 0.38 | 2.9 ± 0.49 | |
Stroke volume variation (%) | 0.873 | ||||||
Group A | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 3.3 | 3.4 ± 5.3 | 2.2 ± 1.8 | 4.5 ± 11.5 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | |
Group B | 2.6 ± 3.9 | 3.1 ± 2.9 | 4.9 ± 8.5 | 2.8 ± 3.1 | 2.5 ± 1.5 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | |
Intrathoracic blood volume index (ml/m2) | 0.387 | ||||||
Group A | 861 ± 132 | 829 ± 129 | 875 ± 120 | 882 ± 122 | 923 ± 137 | 975 ± 136 | |
Group B | 845 ± 153 | 811 ± 151 | 831 ± 192 | 831 ± 169 | 871 ± 128 | 919 ± 214 | |
Systemic vascular resistance index (dyn s/cm5 m2) | 0.005 | ||||||
Group A | 2,663 ± 414 | 2,031 ± 492 | 2,701 ± 604† | 2,418 ± 534 | 2,076 ± 514 | 2,052 ± 430 | |
Group B | 2,732 ± 424 | 2,279 ± 428 | 3,499 ± 964 | 2,902 ± 659 | 2,470 ± 505 | 2,227 ± 507 |
Data presented as the mean ± standard deviation. t1, before anaesthesia; t2, 10 minutes after cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); t3, 2 hours after CPB; t4, 4 hours after CPB; t5, 24 hours after CPB; t6, 44 hours after CPB. aBetween-group differences, general linear model repeated measurement analysis (analysis of variance). †
For the first time according to the literature, we have shown in the present investigation that dextran-70 reduces the inflammatory cytokine response, reduces the peak levels of serum procalcitonin and reduces the peak levels of the markers of endothelial activation or damage during the inflammatory activation following CPB. Earlier investigation had indicated that dextran-70 reduces complement-3 activation product levels during cardiopulmonary bypass [
The exact mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effect of dextran is still unclear. Intravital studies on haemodilution in controlled ischaemia have shown that dextran reduces leukocyte adhesion onto the endothelium. The inhibition of leukocyte–endothelium interaction already occurs in the pharmacological microdose of dextran, independently of the haemodilution effect [
From the good predictive value of procalcitonin [
In our investigation a similarly blunted peak level of IL-8 was found after dextran-70 administration as that reported earlier by Wan and colleagues on coronary patients operated on without CPB [
We found no significant action of dextran-70 on the levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-6r, but the peak concentration of IL-6 and C-reactive protein was lower and that of IL-6r was higher in the group administered dextran. Previous investigations proved that IL-6 [
There is an increasing body of evidence that the damaging effect of ischaemia-reperfusion in the heart is related to inflammatory processes [
In our investigation dextran infusion has increased the stroke volume index independently of the preload by the reduction of the systemic vascular resistance index. Although the intrathoracic blood volume index and stroke volume variation did not differ between the groups it cannot be excluded that the observed differences in haemodynamics are partly due to the different volume effects of dextran and gelatin – whereas on the basis of our sELAM-1 and soluble ICAM-1 results, dextran infusion reduces the degree of the endothelial damage and activation. Particularly high preoperative sELAM-1 plasma concentration figures were found in the dextran group in contrast to the control group, indicating higher preoperative endothelial dysfunction among these patients. The levels of sELAM-1 and ICAM-1 significantly increased in the control group, but did not change in those patients who received dextran. This effect on the activation and damage of the endothelium may explain dextran's favourable influence on the vasomotor regulatory disturbance. Cardiopulmonary bypass alters vasomotor regulation, reducing the endothelium-dependent relaxation [
For the statistical analysis, six series of observations were represented over time to show the haemodynamic status at every examined timepoint of the inflammatory mediators. Using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, these many timepoints have resulted in a very high correction factor, increasing the possible statistical error, which may mask real differences. Although the observed statistical power was high, particularly in case of the SVRI, the clinical relevance of these finding must be justified in a study investigating a larger population.
The administration of HES 130/0.4 has also been investigated on the inflammatory response in other patient populations (for example, in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery). The IL-6, IL-8 and soluble ICAM-1 release was found to be lower in the HES-treated group, but the concentration of sELAM-1 was similar in the HES-treated and in the lactated Ringer's solution-treated groups [
On the basis of comparative animal experiments investigating the effects of colloids on leukocyte-endothelial interaction we have investigated the presumably most effective colloid, dextran-70, during CPB and we have proved its anti-inflammatory effect. Having said that, questions still remain of whether dextran has any advantage over other colloids in the anti-inflammatory properties in clinical situations, and whether it results in real clinical benefit on patient outcome. Further clinical studies are required to compare the anti-inflammatory effect of dextran with that of HES, and large-scale clinical studies must justify that the reduction of inflammation by dextran can be translated into clinical benefit. Another question to be raised is whether dextran administrated in a microdose is, or is not, able to reduce the inflammation in clinical situations of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, as in experimental studies [
Blood loss was higher in the dextran group than the control group, which can be explained by the higher antihaemostatic potential. This difference, however, is surprisingly not clinically significant, since the number of red blood cell transfusions and haematocrit levels did not differ.
The limitation of this study is that gelatin, or any other colloid, administrated in the control group cannot be considered neutral concerning the inflammatory response. An infusion possessing anti-inflammatory effects is more acceptable for the control group than an infusion with proinflammatory features. Although gelatin administration did not influence neutrophil infiltration, NF-κB activation, proinflammatory cytokines levels, ICAM-1 mRNA expression and myeloperoxidase activity in a septic model [
To the best of our knowledge our investigation is the first to show that dextran-70 reduces the inflammatory cytokine response, the liberation of some soluble adhesion molecules and the peak level of procalcitonin following cardiac operations. These results suggest that dextran can reduce the inflammation resulting from either the use of CPB or ischaemia-reperfusion injury rather than from operative trauma. Further large-scale clinical studies are required to demonstrate this effect on patient outcome after cardiac surgery.
• Dextran-70 reduces the inflammatory activation after CPB.
AVR = aortic valve replacement; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB = cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass; cTr-I = cardiac troponin I; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HES = hydroxyethyl starches; ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IL = interleukin; NF = nuclear factor; PMN = polymorphonuclear leukocyte; sELAM-1 = soluble endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1; SVRI = systemic vascular resistance index; TNF = tumour necrosis factor.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KG conceived the study, participated in the design, coordination, measurements and acquisition of data, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript and obtained sponsorship. AB made a substantial contribution to the execution of the study and acquisition of data. NA and LB made a substantial contribution to the design of the study, interpretation of the data and provided critical review of the manuscript. NA participated in the coordination of the study. GK participated in the study design and helped to write the manuscript. VG and JG carried out the immunoassays, discussed the results and provided a critical review of the manuscript. TK carried out laboratory measurements, discussed the results and provided a critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.